Primary Links:

Browse archives

« February 2012  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Have a question to ask? Want to get involved?

Feel free to contact us

Have your say!


Take part in public consultations on nanotechnology

CCoN/NanoCEO reports & letters to government

- 2010 NanoCEO letter to Wisconsin Legislative Special Committee on proposed Nano Act here

- 2010 NanoCEO comments to U.S. EPA on nanosilver product approval here

- 2009 NanoCEO letter to U.S. EPA on nanosilver registration as pesticide here

- 2007 CCoN comments to U.S. NNCO on priority EHS research needs here (under K. Johnson)

- 2005 Report & Recommendations of Madison Citizens Consensus Conference submitted to Wisconsin State Legislators. Report here.

12 July 2009

No nano labelling despite concerns - The Syndey Morning Herald, Australia
The use of nanotechnology in sunscreens has become widespread in recent years, favoured by manufacturers because the resulting clear, easy-to-absorb creams give a market advantage. But in spite of mounting health concerns, the Therapeutic Goods Administration does not even require manufacturers to disclose whether their products contain them.

Latest NanoNews | printer friendly version

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options

Nanotechnology Latest News

The articles presented here do not necessarily reflect NanoCEO's views. Coming from varied sources with different points of view, they make a range of perspectives available, so people can see the diversity of debates currently going on. Sharing different perspectives is essential to healthy citizen deliberation and democracy. You are encouraged to question and evaluate matters further by yourself with the info provided here and elsewhere.