Primary Links:

Browse archives

« February 2012  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
5 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Have a question to ask? Want to get involved?

Feel free to contact us

Have your say!

CCoN/NanoCEO reports & letters to government

- 2010 NanoCEO letter to Wisconsin Legislative Special Committee on proposed Nano Act here

- 2010 NanoCEO comments to U.S. EPA on nanosilver product approval here

- 2009 NanoCEO letter to U.S. EPA on nanosilver registration as pesticide here

- 2007 CCoN comments to U.S. NNCO on priority EHS research needs here (under K. Johnson)

- 2005 Report & Recommendations of Madison Citizens Consensus Conference submitted to Wisconsin State Legislators. Report here.

6 February 2012

Nanomaterials "Just Out of REACH" of European Regulations - The Center for International Environmental Law

Geneva— REACH, the European Union's primary regulation on chemicals is failing to identify or control nanomaterials. That is the conclusion of "Just Out of REACH: How REACH is failing to regulate nanomaterials and how it can be fixed," a new report by the nonprofit Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). Nanomaterials, tiny manmade particles with extraordinary properties, are a fast-growing component of cosmetics, clothing, consumer electronics, and other products.

1 February 2012

The Limits of Nanotechnology - Food & Water Watch

(By Tim Schwab) Last week’s State of the Union Address found President Obama bragging about how few regulations he had implemented as president and how much support he’s going to continue offer the private sector. This sounds an awful lot like business as usual for the White House—promoting innovation at any cost, no matter the impact on human health and the environment.

Case in point: nanomaterials.

The National Research Council (NRC) released a long report last week identifying major gaps in environmental, health and safety research of nanomaterials. Its conclusion: “Despite the promise of nanotechnology…the future of safe and sustainable nanotechnology-based materials, products, and processes is uncertain.”

26 January 2012

NRDC Sues EPA To Stop Nanopesticide - New Haven Independent

(By Gwyneth Shaw) Seeking to halt the sale of a nanosilver-based pesticide until more health and safety information is available, the Natural Resources Defense Council filed a federal suit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Thursday.

The environmental advocacy group, which has been highlighting potential safety concerns about the use of ultra-tiny silver particles as an antimicrobial agent for several years, accused the EPA of giving the manufacturer a “four-year free pass” by allowing the pesticide to come to market. After more than a year of deliberation, the agency granted “conditional registration” in December to HeiQ Materials’ AGS-20 product, which is essentially a composite of nanosilver and nanoscale silica.

4 January 2012

Suing to regulate nanotechnology as the House of Representatives usurps regulatory authority - Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

(By Steve Suppan) On December 21, IATP joined five other NGOs, headed by the International Center for Technology Assessment (ICTA), to sue the Food and Drug Administration for failure to regulate nanoparticles. The lawsuit is the first concerning the health and environmental effects of nanoparticles and nanotechnology enabled products. The FDA currently does not require pre-market health and environmental safety testing of nanomaterials prior to their introduction on the marketplace.

5 January 2012

EPA Watchdog: Nano Efforts Lacking - New Haven Independent

(By Gwyneth Shaw) In a blunt new report, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s internal watchdog finds that the agency lacks both the data and the administrative ability to effectively deal with the challenge posed by super-small materials that are increasingly finding their way into consumer products.

The report, released late last week by the EPA’s inspector general, raises few new issues. But it makes plain the difficulties facing a host of federal agencies as they try to ensure safety without stifling innovation in the ever-broadening field of nanotechnology. While a growing body of evidence suggests there are real questions about the impact of nanomaterials on people, animals and the environment, there are few absolutes in this arena.

21 December 2011

Consumer Safety Groups File First Lawsuit on Risks of
Nanotechnology
- International Center for Technology Assessment

San Francisco, CA – Concerned by the growing body of scientific reports cautioning against the unregulated use of nanotechnology in consumer products, a coalition of nonprofit consumer safety and environmental groups sued the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today. The case is the first lawsuit over the health and environmental risks of nanotechnology and nanomaterials.

8 December 2011

Report: Watch Nano-Based Food Products - New Haven Independent

(By Gwyneth Shaw) Andrew Schneider, an investigative journalist who’s been tracking the emergence of nanotechnology in food and food-related products, has an interesting story about a recent report on the latest developments.

In Food Safety News, Schneider writes up a new report from As You Sow, an environmental and social advocacy group. The report advises caution on introducing super-small nanoparticles into food and packaging and advocates for safety testing before the ultra-tiny materials hit the shelves.

6 December 2011

Nano rules fall foul of data gap - Nature News

(By Eugenie Samuel Reich) The science of the very small will lurk in many a Christmas gift this year. Nanomaterials add strength to golf clubs, odour resistance to socks and ultraviolet protection to cosmetics. But some of their properties could also pose health risks, and regulations covering their manufacture and use have failed to keep pace with the rush to market.

With sizes measured in mere billionths of a metre, nanomaterials have very high surface area relative to their mass, and this could alter their toxicity compared with the same mater­ial in bulk. Yet many nanomaterials are not regulated separately — in part because the high-quality nanotoxicity research needed for regulation is lacking, as an assessment presented at last week’s Materials Research Society meeting in Boston, Massachusetts, made clear.

1 December 2011

EPA Grants 1st Approval For Nanopesticide - New Haven Independent

(By Gwyneth Shaw) More than a year after floating the idea, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has granted the first approval for a pesticide that’s based on a nanoscale material—a Swiss-made antimicrobial nanosilver product used in fabrics.

The EPA announced Thursday that it is moving forward with a four-year “conditional registration” for HeiQ Materials’ AGS-20 product, which is essentially a composite of nanosilver and nanoscale silica. According to HeiQ’s application—first filed in 2008—AGS-20 will be incorporated into textiles.

23 November 2011

Nanotechnology risks get minimal press coverage - Chemistry World

(By Helen Carmicheal) A US study has found scant media coverage of the potential risks posed by nanotechnology, with many more articles extolling its future benefits.

In their longitudinal study spanning coverage from 2000 to 2009 - in 20 US, nine UK newspapers and two wire services - the US researchers looked for articles that could alert readers to nanotechnology's risks.

Sharon Friedman and Brenda Egolf, from Lehigh University in Bethlehem, found the number of stories that mentioned risks averaged around just 37 per year in each country. Three main narratives prevailed - runaway technology, science-based studies and regulation - and journalists most often covered health risks, followed by environmental and societal risk issues. Regulation coverage was less frequent but increased over time.