- Environment
- NanoProducts
- NanoFood
- Cosmetics
- Antimicrobials
- Ethics
- Regulations
Primary Links:
More info on nano:
Search
Browse archives
Syndicate
Have a question to ask? Want to get involved?
Feel free to contact us
Have your say!
Take part in public consultations on nanotechnology
CCoN/NanoCEO reports & letters to government
- 2010 NanoCEO letter to Wisconsin Legislative Special Committee on proposed Nano Act here
- 2010 NanoCEO comments to U.S. EPA on nanosilver product approval here
- 2009 NanoCEO letter to U.S. EPA on nanosilver registration as pesticide here
- 2007 CCoN comments to U.S. NNCO on priority EHS research needs here (under K. Johnson)
- 2005 Report & Recommendations of Madison Citizens Consensus Conference submitted to Wisconsin State Legislators. Report here.
archives
2 February 2010
Is It "Nano" Cream? Or Isn't It? - New Haven Independent, New Hampshire
By Alex Halperin. The luxury makeup company Chantecaille hawks1.7 ounce pots of high-tech sounding “Nano Gold Energizing Cream” for $420. Other cosmetics companies avoid references to nanotechnology like a dead rat on the samples counter.
For cosmetics companies these days, nanotechnology can be a selling point or a radioactive taboo. But they’re at liberty to say as much or as little as they want about their use of this science. If one U.S. senator has his way, regulators will be better equipped to determine whether that facial cream, sunscreen or foundation contains “nanoparticles” – and whether it presents a hazard to the public.